Schenectady and Saratoga Plank Road Co. v. . Thatcher
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the supreme court sitting in the fourth district. The action was brought to recover a balance due on a subscription by the defendant for one hundred shares of plaintiff’s capital stock, and was tried at the Schenectady circuit before Justice Willard, without a jury.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the supreme court sitting in the fourth district. The action was brought to recover a balance due on a subscription by the defendant for one hundred shares of plaintiff’s capital stock, and was tried at the Schenectady circuit before Justice Willard, without a jury. The plaintiff proved that on the 23d of Dec. 1848, the defendant with others subscribed a written instrument by which he agreed to take and pay for one hundred shares, at fifty dollars each, of the capital stock of a plank road company to be incorporated to construct a plank road from Schenectady to…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I cannot agree with the defendant's counsel, that it was necessary to…
2Cited by46 opinions
- Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hopkins v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Mayor of New York v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.