Legal Opinion

United States v. Banks

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 30, 1974No. Cr. 73-5034, Cr. 73-5062, Cr. 73-5035 and Cr. 73-5063PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

In this case, stemming from the 71 day siege/occupation of the hamlet of Wounded Knee, South Dakota, an extended adversary hearing was held, pursuant to the requirements of Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969), to determine whether this case should be dismissed on the basis of governmental misconduct. The motion propounds four basic charges: (1) the alleged illegal interception of wire communications from Wounded Knee through use of a party line at roadblock one; (2) the alleged failure of the government to comply…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  3. United States v. MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. AmlaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Kratz v. KratzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API