Legal Opinion

Kratz v. Kratz

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-795PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages caused by the allegedly illegal interception of the plaintiffs’ telephone communications by the defendants. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and the plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment as to liability. For the following reasons, we will deny both motions.

1. FACTS: 1

The plaintiff Mildred Kratz, and the defendant Lowell Kratz, were married in 1947. In 1975, Mildred filed for divorce, and though she and Lowell were estranged, they…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. David N. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Francesco G. Campiti v. Michael A. WalonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API