Legal Opinion

In Re Royal

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963No. 37848PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey

The Committee on Grievances of the Chicago Bar Association, acting as commissioners of this court under Rule 59, have filed a report recommending that respondent, William J. Royal, be suspended from the practice of law in this State for the period of one year. The committee found that on two occasions the respondent had converted the funds of clients to his own use. Respondent, who was admitted to the practice of law in 1951, has filed exceptions to the commissioners’ report.

A 5-count complaint was filed against the respondent on February 19, 1962. Count I charged in effect that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kapraun v. KapraunIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People ex rel. Black v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. In Re HallmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. In Re StilloIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re KrasnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API