Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Domschot

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1952No. 31831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Alex H. Domschot and Edith A., his wife, owned improved real estate in Seattle which they sold to Ruth B. Jackson under a real-estate contract for fifteen thousand five hundred dollars. An initial payment of twenty-five hundred dollars was made. The remaining balance of thirteen thousand dollars, together with interest, was to be paid in monthly installments of eighty dollars, or more, per month.

The real-estate contract prepared by respondent’s attorney (exhibit A, attached to plaintiff’s complaint) contains the following provision which gave rise to this controversy:

“Sellers shall have the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buck v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Chaffee v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Andersonian Investment Co. v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Anderson v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Preugschat v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API