Legal Opinion
State Auto. Ins. Co. of Columbus, Ohio v. Rowland
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1968PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burnett
The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court; to-wit, plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. G-. C. Rowland, and the defendant, State Automobile Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio.
The plaintiffs carried a policy of automobile liability insurance with the defendant company providing limited coverage to $5,000.00 for personal injuries plus similar limited coverage for property damage. This policy was in full force and effect on November 23, 1962, when Mrs. Rowland was involved in an automobile accident with one M. A. McRea, while driving the automobile insured by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Cernocky v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Alex N. Bell v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Rocor International, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.