Legal Opinion
James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2010No. Civil Action 07-2107 (RBW)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Ian Phillip James, the plaintiff in this civil case, is seeking “compensatory damages for past benefits that have been improperly denied to him,” Third Amended Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 23, and a “declaratory judgment as to the amount of retirement benefits, both past and future, to which he is entitled to under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (2000) (the “ERISA”), id. ¶ 25. Additionally, the plaintiff alleges that defendants International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan and its…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lurie v. Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Angela Henderson Williamson v. Travelport, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Boster v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.