Legal Opinion
James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 07-2107 (RBW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ian Phillip James brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (2006) (the “ERISA”), alleging that the defendants wrongfully denied him pension benefits, did not provide an adequate explanation for their decision to deny him these benefits, and failed to produce certain pension plan documents. See Third Amended Compl. (“3d Am. Compl.”) ¶¶ 22-46. Currently before the Court are the parties’ renewed cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon careful consideration of the parties’…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brown v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Balkin v. UNUM Life Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.