Legal Opinion

Drexel v. Richards

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1897No. 6708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 48 Neb., 732.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is a rehearing of the case reported in 48 Neb., 732. From a decree foreclosing certain mechanics’ liens the defendants Bartlett & Downing appealed. On the former hearing the decree, in so far as it awarded the Kennard Glass & Paint Company a lien, was reversed because of an insufficient description of the premises, and in all other respects the decree of the trial court was *510affirmed. The following propositions were laid down in the opinion heretofore filed:

1. A sworn statement for a mechanic’s lien by a subcontractor must describe the land on which the materials furnished by him have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Springer v. KroeschellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kezartee v. Marks & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Scholes & Goodall v. Hughes & BoswellTexas Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Western Iron Works v. Montana Pulp & Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Guiou v. RyckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rosebud Lumber & Coal Co. v. HolmsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Ryan Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API