Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Scholes & Goodall v. Hughes & Boswell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1890No. 6991PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge. —

On the 17th day of September, 1887, Scholes & Goodall sued Hughes & Boswell and the city of Hillsboro in the District Court of Hill County to recover the sum of 8164.65 and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien to satisfy said debt.

Hughes & Boswell were the original contractors with the city, and it is alleged that they bound themselves in writing to pay appellants $1129 as per contract attached to the petition for labor and material furnished; that appellants completed their work on the 11th of February, 1887, and that the balance sued for was due. It was further alleged that they…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goodrich Lumber Co. v. DavieMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Houston v. MyersTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Blanco, Inc. v. PorrasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Boots Builders, Inc. v. Hobson Air Conditioning, Inc. (In Re Boots Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  5. Johnson v. EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API