Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Largman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1935No. Appeals, 69 and 70PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The plaintiff, Otto Max Schuster, was employed by the Largman, Gray Company (a corporation), from 1920 to March 6, 1931, when he was discharged. Alleging the discharge to be a breach of contract, plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit to recover damages against Largman, Gray Company, and Harry Largman and Joseph Largman, the majority stockholders of the company. He bases his claim upon three agreements: (1) a contract (Exhibit “A”) made in 1919 between the Largmans, Wilfred Gray, and himself, providing for the incorporation of the corporate defendant; (2) a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cleary v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Vierling v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McClennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Bossuyt v. Osage Farmers National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Terry v. ZachryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Srednick v. SylakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Zachrel v. Universal Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API