Holmes v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The plaintiff in the above-enumerated protest imported into the United States from Canada certain wood described on the invoice as “Glued Maple S2S” on which duty was assessed at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52373, for “Manufactures of wood * * * not specially provided for.”
The protest claim is for free entry under the provision in paragraph 1803 of the said act for “Wood: (1) * * * sawed lumber * * * not further manufactured than planed, and tongued and grooved * * with consequent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- C. S. Emery & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frampton v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Drittler v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- C. B. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Aaron Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.