Legal Opinion

Carr v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1921No. 2057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 4376Ó.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of dressed birch flooring which was imported from Canada. It was assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem as a manufacture of wood not specially provided for, under paragraph 176 of the tariff act of 1913.

The importer protested against the assessment, claiming free entry for the flooring under paragraph 647 of the act, as "lumber, not further manufactured than sawed, planed, and tongued and grooved.” A copy of this paragraph follows, with the provision just referred to in italics:

FREE LIST!

647. Wood: Logs, timber, round, unmanufactured,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Myers & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. S. Emery & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. B. Axelrod & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. United States v. MitsuiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API