Legal Opinion
United Brick & Clay Workers v. Robinson Clay Product Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 31, 1946No. Civ. 23226PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, District Judge.
Robinson Clay Product Company and Stowe-Fuller Refractories Company operate clay processing plants i-n Ohio, and Thomas Rockwell is an officer of each of the two companies. The two corporations subscribe to an employers service furnished by Stevenson, Jordon & Harrison, Inc., for which E. W. Marcellus is an agent. The remaining twelve defendants are members of the Fifth Regional War Labor Board.
Plaintiff, the collective bargaining agent for the employees of the two corporate defendants, alleges that on November 2, 1943 it negotiated contracts with them providing for wage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Relf v. GaschCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Thomas M. Armstrong v. Robert Sears, Ulises Delgado, John Rice, and Frederick MaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Lawrence v. AcreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Morford v. Bellanca Aircraft Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1949
- American Newspaper Guild v. MacKinnonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.