Legal Opinion

Larsen v. The Myrtle

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 20, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

Libelants, as owners of the schooner Lookout, bring this suit to recover damages sustained by their schooner from a collision *780with the schooner Myrtle, on the waters of Lake Michigan, on the 1st day of June, 1888, charging that the collision came about solely from the negligent management of the Myrtle, while, by the answer, the owners of the Myrtle charge that the collision occurred solely from the fault of those in charge of the Lookout, and they file a cross-libel to recover damages sustained by the Myrtle from the collision. The proof in the case is all from the decks of the two vessels,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. The HypodameSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Eagle WingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1905
  2. Owners of the Gen. Geary v. The George W. ChildsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. The LivingstoneDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1898
  4. Parrilla v. Schooner "Esperanza"District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API