Rubberset Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
WatsoN, Judge:
Defendant bas moved to dismiss tbe complaint for failure to state a cause of action, a motion not specifically set out in tbe rules of tbis court but one I would not hesitate to entertain and grant pursuant to Rule 1.1(b) 1 if tbe circumstances so required.
Plaintiffs are seeking relief pursuant to item 807.00 of tbe Tariff Schedules of tbe United States,2 thus claiming in effect that tbe value of certain components made in tbe United States should be deducted from tbe dutiable value of tbe importation. Tbe specific shortcoming claimed by defendant is a failure by plaintiffs to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byrd v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Karlinsky v. New York Racing Association, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Britton v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- James X. Conway v. I. Slaughter, Psychiatrist, California Medical Facility, and Fifty-Eight OthersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975