Legal Opinion

Britton v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 12, 1952No. C. D. 1485PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise at issue in this case consists of two carloads of machinery described as “1 lot used vegetable oil mill machinery parts (hydraulic presses and parts).” It was entered under the provisions of duty-free paragraph 1615 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, as American goods returned. The appraiser described the merchandise as not marked to indicate country of origin, and the collector assessed duty thereon at the appropriate rate under the provisions of said act, giving as the reason for such assessment the "Non-production…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oil Well Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Imperial Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Marrero v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Goldkamp v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Rubberset Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Coppersmith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. Air-Sea Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API