Legal Opinion
Krigsman v. Progressive Northern Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 7, 2005No. 2003-834PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The petitioner, Craig Krigsman, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) denying his request for declaratory relief against the respondent, Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Progressive). The petitioner argues that the trial court improperly concluded that he had materially breached his duty to cooperate with Progressive in the investigation of his insurance claim. We affirm.
The following facts were found by the trial court or are evident in the record. On March 7, 2002, the petitioner was in a single vehicle accident, resulting in the total loss of his vehicle. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Lorenzo-Martinez v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Bianco Professional Ass'n v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Godbout v. Lloyd's Insurance Syndicates Messrs. Mendes & MountSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richard v. Good Luck Trailer Court, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Banfield v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Belanger v. MMG InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Dolan v. Kemper Independence Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Gerke v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.