Legal Opinion
Gerke v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 15, 2011No. 3:10-cv-01035-ACPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On June 6, 2011, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued his Findings and Recom mendation (“F & R”) [46] in the above-captioned case, recommending that the Motion for Summary Judgment [14] filed by Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America (“Travelers”) be granted and that plaintiffs claim against Travelers be dismissed without prejudice. On June 20, 2011, Travelers filed a Supplement to Clarify the Record [49] (“Supplement”), along with a supporting declaration [50] (“Bernstein Declaration”). Plaintiff filed objections to the F & R on June 24, 2011 [53].…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McBride v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Smagala v. Sequoia InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Goldman v. Vigilant Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022