Cambridge Co. v. Arizona Lawn Sprinklers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.
The issue in this appeal from the granting of summary judgment is whether a company that acts as an agent in the sale of a business is required to be licensed as a real estate broker because the sale could have included the transfer of a lease of real property. We find that the company is not required to be licensed and affirm the summary judgment. We also affirm the denial of attorney’s fees, the issue raised in the cross-appeal.
Appellant Arizona Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. (hereafter Sprinklers), a corporation whose sole shareholders are appellants William and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Adams v. BearArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Maganas v. NorthroupArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- L. M. White Contracting Co. v. St. Joseph Structural Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Bonasera v. RoffeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- CFA Northern California, Inc. v. CRT Partners LLPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005