Legal Opinion

Maganas v. Northroup

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1975No. 11689PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Thomas C. Maganas from a summary judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Jurisdiction was acquired on transfer from the Court of Appeals pursuant to 17A, A. R.S., Supreme Court Rule 47(e) (5).

Appellees, Porter and Edith Northroup, licensed in Arizona as real estate brokers, held a listing from Mary Martori for property called the “Mary E” ranch. Mary Martori was the sole stockholder of the common stock of the Fred G. Hilvert Co., Inc., the corporate owner of the ranch. The Northroups contacted D. C. McCredie, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Foster v. House Beautiful Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Maganas v. NorthroupArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GranilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Ray Korte Chevrolet v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API