Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Toetly

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1971No. 10693PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

This action for damages resulting from an automobile collision was previously before this Court in 1969, 1 on appeal by defendant-respondent Toetly after a jury verdict for defendant and an order by the trial judge for a new trial. We affirmed the order granting a new trial. 2 Subsequently, a new trial was had in the district court, and again the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant Toetly. Judgment was entered for Toetly based on the verdict. Plaintiffs-appellants Henry and Mary Rosenberg now appeal from a denial by the trial court of their motion for a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam Van Hining and Phillips Petroleum Company, Andeconomic Development Administration of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Messmer v. KerIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Spence v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Bannock Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API