Rosenberg v. Toetly
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Chief Justice.
This action for damages resulting from an automobile collision was previously before this Court in 1969, 1 on appeal by defendant-respondent Toetly after a jury verdict for defendant and an order by the trial judge for a new trial. We affirmed the order granting a new trial. 2 Subsequently, a new trial was had in the district court, and again the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant Toetly. Judgment was entered for Toetly based on the verdict. Plaintiffs-appellants Henry and Mary Rosenberg now appeal from a denial by the trial court of their motion for a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam Van Hining and Phillips Petroleum Company, Andeconomic Development Administration of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Messmer v. KerIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Spence v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Bannock Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.