Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1995No. 20589PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

A full statement of the facts leading up to this litigation is provided in Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Company (Burgess I), 119 Idaho 299, 805 P.2d 1223 (1991), wherein this Court remanded the matter to the district court for a new trial. A brief summary of the subsequent proceedings which lead to the present appeal follows.

On December 18,1992, the trial court filed its Opinion and Order as to various pretrial motions filed by the parties. Of relevance is the court’s decision to allow Salmon River Canal Company (SRCC) to use tort…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hurtado v. LAND O'LAKES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Clark v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cramer v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API