Legal Opinion

Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Bannock Paving Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1987No. 16008PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Bannock Paving Company (Bannock) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury trial in an action brought by Garrett Freightlines (Garrett), seeking contribution from Bannock and the State of Idaho for amounts paid in settlement of claims arising from a multi-vehicle accident at a road construction site on Interstate 84 near Mountain Home, Idaho. The jury returned a verdict apportioning fault to Bannock, 30%; to the state, 40%; and to Garrett Freightlines, 30%. Bannock appeals, contending that there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict or, in the alternative, that, as…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hurtado v. LAND O'LAKES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API