Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Whitacre v. Ladd

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1985No. 50488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Presiding Judge.

This original prohibition proceeding presents the question whether a deposition subpoena duces tecum issued to a witness and commanding the production of documents to be used only for impeachment purposes at trial should be quashed. The trial judge denied a motion to quash the subpoena and ordered the production of the documents. We issued our preliminary writ in prohibition which we now make absolute.

Plaintiffs below, Corene and David Mitchell, filed suit against relator Mitchell Whitacre for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff Corene Mitchell…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Anheuser v. NolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Hammack v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Hammond v. Schuermann Building & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Dixon v. DarnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Creighton v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Jones v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API