Smith Development, Inc. v. Flood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Appellant/plaintiff, Smith Development, Inc., appeals the bench trial judgment in favor of appellee/defendant Kim M. Flood in its action grounded on quantum meruit and unjust enrichment.
Appellant was contacted to build a house for Mr. and Mrs. Dyer on land being offered for sale and owned jointly by appellee Flood and her friend Boling. Appellant’s salesman contacted Boling regarding the purchase of the land. Although an approximate purchase price of $12,000 probably was mentioned, no agreement was reached and no written contract for purchase executed. Boling…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Jackson v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Stowers v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Sosebee v. McCrimmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Scott v. Mamari Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.