Legal Opinion
Scott v. Mamari Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 22, 2000No. A99A1757PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
Robert Lewis Scott, Jr. d/b/a Scott Construction reconstructed a dam located on a real estate development but was not fully paid for his services. Apparently unable to recover from the developer with whom he contracted, Scott filed claims against two of the development’s creditors and claimed that he was a third-party beneficiary to certain financing agreements related to the development. The trial court granted the creditors’ motion for summary judgment, and Scott appeals. Because we find that Scott was neither a third-party beneficiary of these agreements nor entitled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Miree v. United StatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Reidling v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Smith Development, Inc. v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. 3-D Excavators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Perry Golf Course Development, LLC v. HOUS. AUTH. OF CITY OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Jackson v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Stoker v. BELLEMEADE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Jones v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Crisp Regional Hospital, Inc. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.