Stowers v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Stowers, a homeowner, entered into an oral contract with the appellee to construct additional rooms and improvements on his house. Hall eventually sued for the balance claimed due under the contract and recovered $12,000 by jury verdict. Stowers appeals.
1. The first enumeration complains that the court, at the conclusion of the plaintiffs evidence, denied Stowers’ motion to limit recovery on the ground plaintiff was “seeking damages for profit in excess of the contract price.” Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the oral contract was in the sum of $33,187.24. By…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crankshaw v. Stanley Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Brumby v. SMITH & PLASTER CO. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Palmer v. HowseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- MILLICAN ELECTRIC CO. INC. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Marathon Oil Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.