Legal Opinion

Glaviano v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 26, 2018No. C077743PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauro, J.

*748After Jerald Glaviano interceded in a confrontation between two of his students, the Sacramento City Unified School District (the District) placed him on unpaid leave and issued an accusation and a notice of intent to dismiss or suspend him without pay. Following a hearing, the Commission on Professional Competence (Commission) dismissed the accusation and ordered the District to reinstate Glaviano to his former position with back pay and benefits.

Education Code section 449441 provides that if the Commission determines an employee should not be dismissed or suspended, the governing board of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Horn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Independent Living Center of Southern California v. David Maxwell-JollyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  5. Law Office of Carlos R. Perez v. Whittier Union High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API