Cranmer v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals from the superior court’s order granting special action relief to appellee Eileen Cranmer, arguing that the court disregarded Rule 38, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S., erroneously held an evidentiary hearing, and improperly substituted its judgment for that of the Apache Junction municipal court. Because we agree that the superior court incorrectly interpreted Rule 38 and abused its discretion in holding an evidentiary hearing, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The facts pertinent to our resolution of this appeal are not in dispute. The state charged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Files v. BernalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State of Arizona v. George Benjamin LarinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Ritchie v. Salvatore Gatto Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- J v. v. Hon blair/morrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.