Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1962PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In this case the Complainants claim in their bill as amended to be entitled to contribution from the defendants of 50% of the amount that they have been required to pay or are in the process of paying in weekly installments to Lonnie Huberts for benefits adjudged to be due him under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The defendants, Howard Gr. Smith doing business as Cookeville Pure Milk Company and Highway Casualty Company, filed a joint demurrer. The defendant, Lonnie Roberts, filed a separate demurrer. Upon the hearing the Chancellor sustained the demurrers from which this appeal has been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Evans's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Claim of Anderson v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lock v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Parker v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  4. Clarence Trosper v. Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Crew v. First Source Furniture GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API