Milks Ex Rel. Milks v. Clark's Greensboro, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Cueiam.
The essential facts, .-according to- the court’s unchallenged findings, may be summarized as follows:
The summons and -complaint were duly served on each defendant on November 13, 1962. No answer, demurrer or other pleading having been filed by either defendant, judgment by default and inquiry was entered December 19, 1962, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Rockingham County.
The copy of summons and complaint served on the corporate defendant was mailed November 13, 1962, by its Greensboro manager to the company’s “New York office.” The said Greensboro manager assured the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stephens Ex Rel. Houston v. ChildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jones v. STATESVILLE ICE AND FUEL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Greitzer v. EasthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Abernethy v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Brown v. HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- St. Arnold v. Star Expansion IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re LaughinghouseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Hayes v. EVERGO TELEPHONE CO., LTD.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- St. Arnold v. Star Expansion IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1974