Greitzer v. Eastham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The decisions on the subject now before us are not entirely satisfactory with respect to their consistency. In fact, many of them are irreconcilable. Sutherland v. McLean, 199 N.C. 345, 154 S.E. 662.
In the instant case, the court below was not requested to find the facts. Therefore, it will be presumed that the court declined to set aside the judgments on the facts as alleged in the complaint, the motion of the defendant and the affidavits filed in support thereof. Crissman v. Palmer, 225 N.C. 472, 35 S.E. 2d 422.
In the case of Holcomb v. Holcomb, 192 N.C. 504, 135 S.E. 287, Stacy, C.J.,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- National Life Insurance v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- McLeod v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ward v. Cook United, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Estate of Teel Ex Rel. Naddeo v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Jones v. STATESVILLE ICE AND FUEL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Seibold v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Milks Ex Rel. Milks v. Clark's Greensboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.