Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1963No. 601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The determinative question before us is whether or not the neglect of defendants’ attorneys in failing to file answer within the time allowed, in light -of the facts and circumstances disclosed by the record, is imputable to these defendants.

What duty does the law impose upon a defendant in a civil action with respect to filing answer or other pleading?

The decisions on the subject now before us are not entirely satisfactory with respect to their consistency. In fact, many of them are irreconcilable. Sutherland v. McLean, 199 N.C. 345, 154 S.E. 662. However, the general rule seems to be that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Griel v. . VernonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Sutherland v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Stephens Ex Rel. Houston v. ChildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodge v. FIRST ATLANTIC CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Milks Ex Rel. Milks v. Clark's Greensboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Gaster v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Williams Lumber Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API