St. Arnold v. Star Expansion Industries
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment and also from a previous order denying defendant’s motion to quash the summons and its service and to set aside the *642same judgment. We shall first discuss that motion and order.
1. The summons and its service was sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the court.
Defendant’s motion to quash first contends that defendant was “improperly named,” in that its proper name is Star Expansion Industries Corporation, not Star Expansion Industries, as named in the summons and complaint. Defendant says that plaintiff…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- Hayes v. GessnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Bella v. Aurora Air, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Flexsteel Industries, Inc. v. Morbern Industries Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.