Legal Opinion

Fralick v. Guyer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This action was brought by appellant as Commissioner of Finance to recover from respondent a sum equal to the par value of respondent’s stock in the Bellevue *652Bank and Trust Company, said stock having been fully paid up.

Respondent demurred to the complaint on the ground that the facts stated did not constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, appellant declined to plead further and judgment of dismissal was thereupon entered, from which this appeal was taken.

C. S., sec. 5274, upon which the action is founded, reads in part as follows: “The stockholders of every incorporated bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Feehan v. KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wall v. Basin Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Schricker v. RidingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Williams v. BaldridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Straughan v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. MacEy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Shattuck v. EllisIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API