Legal Opinion

Straughan v. City of Coeur D'Alene

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. Nos. 5905, 5905aPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Appellants, taxpayers of the City of Coeur d’Alene, sought to enjoin the city councilmen and city from carrying into effect two ordinances regularly adopted by a sufficient vote of the citizens of the city, under the provisions of chapter 152, Sess.' Laws 1931, one providing for the acquisition by the city of a municipal lighting plant; the other, a waterworks system.

While separate actions, they involve identical issues, and have been consolidated for consideration.

Appellants contend that chapter 152, Sess. Laws 1931, page 255, and the ordinances thereunder, are unconstitutional under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Feil v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. McBee v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Koch v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Village of Moyie Springs v. Aurora Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hanson v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API