Legal Opinion

Yates v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 4, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The trial of the appellant, Marshall Yates, in the Boyle circuit court under an indictment charging him with the crime of wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously having carnal knowledge of and sexual intercourse with Lillian Toombs, “a female under the age of eighteen years, not his wife, with her consent,” resulted in a verdict of the jury finding him guilty and fixing his punishment at confinement for two years in the penitentiary. He was refused a new trial and the verdict approved by the judgment of the court, and from that judgment he prosecutes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Chaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Fenston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  4. Render v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Meade v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. State v. WingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API