Render v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
The appellant was indicted and convicted for a violation of section 1155 of the Kentucky Statutes as amended by chapter 17 of the Acts of 1922, his punishment being fixed at two years in the penitentiary, the minimum for the offense of which he was charged. The errors relied upon by him to secure a reversal of that judgment may be grouped under four heads: (1) Error in instructions; (2) error in admission and exclusion of evidence; (3) misconduct of the Commonwealth’s attorney; (4) nonsupport of the verdict by the evidence.
The indictment charges…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rinker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Music v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Chaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Lewis v. MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. HunterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Mink v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Hunley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.