Service Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
The issue in this matter is whether the plaintiff has shown “good cause” under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of *346Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for an order to compel defendants Ramapo Wine & Liquor Corporation and Samuel Green-stein to produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and copy certain documents.
This is a triple damage action under the Clayton and Sherman Acts, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, 12 et seq., which alleges, in substance, that the defendants conspired to destroy plaintiff’s business because plaintiff refused to become a party to a conspiracy to fix wholesale…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1966
- Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Jensen v. Boston InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Richland Wholesale Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.