Legal Opinion

Service Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

The issue in this matter is whether the plaintiff has shown “good cause” under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of *346Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for an order to compel defendants Ramapo Wine & Liquor Corporation and Samuel Green-stein to produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and copy certain documents.

This is a triple damage action under the Clayton and Sherman Acts, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, 12 et seq., which alleges, in substance, that the defendants conspired to destroy plaintiff’s business because plaintiff refused to become a party to a conspiracy to fix wholesale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  3. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1966
  3. Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jensen v. Boston InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  5. Richland Wholesale Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API