Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 7314SC133PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for a preliminary hearing was properly denied.

Defendant excepts to the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial. Before entering a plea on the bill of indictment, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that defendant was not afforded a speedy trial in derogation of his Sixth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. Prior to the case being placed on the calendar, defendant had made this motion in written form and filed it with the court. The court denied the motion without affording…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. DixSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. . TartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. DeanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API