Legal Opinion

State v. Harvell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1980No. 793SC724PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

It is clear from the argument in defendant’s brief concerning the charge of second degree rape that he intended to appeal from the judgment entered therein. A copy of the indictment, verdict and formal judgment on the charge of second degree rape was not included in the record on appeal. Both the defense counsel and the Attorney General submitted briefs in this Court. Neither made any objection or called any attention to the defective condi tion of the record as it pertains to the purported appeal on the charge of second degree rape. Rule 9(b)(3)(vii) provides that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. State v. HargroveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API