Legal Opinion

Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 13, 2006No. 1 CA-CV 04-0196PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 A contractor, Evans Withycombe, Inc., appeals the dismissal of its third-party complaint against its subcontractors based on Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-552 (2003), a statute of repose. Because § 12-552 bars Evans Withycombe’s contract-based claims against its subcontractors, we affirm in part. Because it does not bar Evans Withycombe’s common-law indemnity claims against its subcontractors, we reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Ira and Wilma Weiss purchased a home in the Meridian at McCormick Ranch.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Albano v. SHEA HOMES LTD. PARTNERSHIPArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API