Northern Counties Bank v. Earl Himovitz & Sons Livestock Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
We granted a rehearing in this case because at the time of preparing our original opinion we were under a misapprehension concerning an important circumstance. The circumstance involved the actual date and the conditions under which a negotiable draft bearing date of November 30, 1960, was issued to Himovitz, the third party claimant. Both parties to this appeal agree as to the actual event. Not by way of complaint but simply in passing, we note that appellate courts do not have the benefit of trial court findings in third party claim proceedings.
Jack Rose was an independent cattle buyer and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- United States v. NektalovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Calva Products v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fanucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Fount-Wip, Inc. v. GolsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.