Legal Opinion

State v. Postema

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 12, 1987No. 17535-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Daniel Postema and Claudia Howard appeal a judgment and sentence for bookmaking on the basis that the statute under which they were charged is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.

In late 1984, the Everett police became aware of a bookmaking operation under the code name "Hammer" allegedly operating from a telephone number belonging to Daniel Postema at 1501 Rockefeller, Everett, Washington. Posing as a bettor, an Everett police sergeant called the Postema number and talked to Claudia Howard. Howard told the sergeant that she had a "line" through Las Vegas on college football games and all the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nisqually Delta Ass'n v. City of DuPontWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. O'NEILLWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lemons & Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TakacsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. ShattuckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Jindra v. Golden WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. INTERNET COMM. & ENTERTAINMENT CORP. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Internet Community & Entertainment Corp. v. Washington State Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API