State v. Shattuck
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.
Randall Shattuck seeks discretionary review of the Superior Court's decision affirming a judgment and sentence for driving while intoxicated entered in Bellevue District Court. Shattuck complains that the trial court erred in finding that he had waived the right to raise any factual issues in defense of his prosecution on stipulated evidence. We affirm.
Shattuck was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated on October 27, 1984. Shattuck petitioned for a deferred prosecution pursuant to RCW 10.05, under which a defendant can receive treatment for a substance abuse problem in lieu of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.