Legal Opinion
Harris v. James
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1997No. 95-6861PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
In the instant ease, plaintiffs-appellees brought a class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Alabama’s Medicaid plan was not in compliance with a federal regulation requiring State Medicaid plans to ensure necessary transportation for recipients to and from providers. The district court granted summary judgment to the *996plaintiffs and later approved a remedial plan agreed to by the parties. On appeal, the State officials (hereinafter referred to as “the State”) argue that the regulation does not create a right enforceable in a § 1983 action. For the reasons…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of Indiana State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Doe v. ChilesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Brian Bruggeman by and Through His Parents, Kenneth and Carol Bruggeman v. Rod BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.