Legal Opinion

Doe v. Pfrommer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 10, 1998No. 97-7614PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

148 F.3d 73

13 NDLR P 28

John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Paul PFROMMER, individually and in his official capacity as

Director of the Rochester Office of Vocational Educational

Services for Individuals with Disabilities (VESID) and

Lawrence Gloeckler, individually and in his official

capacity as Deputy Commissioner of New York State VESID

Office, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 97-7614.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued March 24, 1998.

Decided June 10, 1998.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Keitt v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Walters v. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Dean v. University at Buffalo School of Medicine & Biomedical SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API