Legal Opinion
Leone v. Knighton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1985No. 12498PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
The principal question raised by this appeal relates to the denial of the plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint. It clearly appears there was no error in denying the motion.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile collision on Route 84 in East Hartford. The plaintiff claimed that the collision was caused by the negligent operation of the defendant’s automobile. The defendant denied negligence and, in a special defense, charged contributory negligence by the plaintiff. Before commencement of the trial, the defendant admitted liability…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Broschart v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Lawson v. GodfriedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Tillinghast v. LeppertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aksomitas v. AksomitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Stern v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sherman v. RoncoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Jack v. ScanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.