Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Godfried

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 10, 1980PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue of importance to this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motions to amend their complaint. The plaintiffs, Margaret Lawson and James Lawson, on May 30, 1973, brought an action against the defendant, Milton S. Glodfried, alleging medical malpractice in conjunction with surgery performed in 1971. The complaint alleged failure to use the care and skill ordinarily used by physicians engaged in medical practice. More specifically the plaintiffs claimed that the defendant had not successfully performed the operation, a tubal ligation,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Johnson v. ToscanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Freccia v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Smith v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Crowell v. Middletown Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API